So it's Christmas.
And in that sentence
seems the entire motivation for writing this: happy twinkles in your
heart, inundation of goodwill (especially from the local shops, whose
saving offers – they seem to think – border on Richard
Branson-sized generosity), and of course, the familiar story
re-invigorating my imagination. I always like to look at it in a new
way each year – the temptation to confine it in mental
Christmas-card snapshots and childlike warm-and-fuzzies is exactly
what shelves it among the likes of Santa, the Grinch, and that jar of
fruit mince in your fridge for mincepies – they only ever come out
on one occasion.
Just because that's what we do every
year.
I'm not about to jump on the
anti-consumerism bandwagon (though for Christmas, Easter chocolate
and Valentines' roses I could rant for hours). But consider: why else
but for silly sentiment do we drag boxes of dusty and tired décor
from the garage and install it in the house for a set period of time?
My little soapbox sermon today is not for anti-consumerism, but for
anti-sentimentalism... and my
thesis this year was on narrative empathy – go figure.
Again
a disclaimer: I do not pretend to be a cynic on this issue. I,
probably more than most, appreciate and generate the happy twinkles,
and write about them and dream about them, and for ages can stare
contentedly at the myriad of pretty shadows made by the lights on the
Christmas tree. But I'm
reminded of the phrase (probably paraphrased or misquoted, but
anyway) that which brings a man to faith sustains him.
Why do
you sing the carols? Why, once a year, if never at any other point,
is the idea of a present God, Emmanuel, less offensive to you? Why,
even if you see through the gift-exchange, because Christmas is
actually about Christ, is the preparation of the traditional feast,
the exact calculation and budgeting for perfect gifts, so
extraordinarily important? If you come to God at this time because
you like to keep it up, or you like the warm fuzzies, let me be
another in a long line of people to try and pop that bubble. What is
the distant mood of the Christmas spirit going to do for you during
an existential crisis at midyear?
But I
digress.
This
year, I have been contemplating myrrh. (And if we're going to discuss
wise men being brought to God by a star – that involves a separate
post). I remember, in an otherwise forgettable representation of the
story, a man presenting a gift to the boy Jesus, after the
gold-for-a-king and expensive frankinsense were presented, saying
“Myrrh is for dying and day of death.” It was perhaps a bit harsh
for a children's film, but gives new context to “And Mary treasured
up all these things and pondered them in her heart.”
And
perhaps, in keeping with my theory on injecting new emotions into
tired narratives, I will venture a heretical statement: that
Christmastime
is not so much a time to
contemplate warm blessings,
but a tragedy. It's not difficult to be awed by the intricate
operating bodies of newborns, the springing of new life in a tiny and
complete human form, and yet here was one who had been branded at
birth, like a Jewish child
born in a concentration camp, marked for death. I don't know about
you, but this year I find that desperately sad.
I have
two friends whose dearest (and until now impossible dream) of having
a child has just come true, and seeing this tiny person, so fragile
and dependent, scares me terribly because I know (and can feel from
their new-parent over-protective and by-the-book regime) how much the
loss of her might affect them. Now consider Mary.
Now
consider God.

No comments:
Post a Comment